Basically, my paper is about the economic side of the food industry. Because pretty much everything that occurs in the food system (meat production/consumption, farming, advertising, obesity, etc) affects the American economy, I was wondering if the country could thrive financially if we did reform the way we ate. So could we continue to survive economically if we decreased our consumerism from corrupt factories and increased our organic food consumption?
There are a ton of facts saying that we'd actually make more money as an economy if we only bought from local farms and served less meat in cafeterias, but if big food conglomerates shut down, the economic flow would be even more affected. These conglomerates provide jobs, provide food for low income households, and provide food bought by almost everyone. Without this, where would we be? In my paper, I plan to address all the pros and cons of the idea.
But to be honest, I'm not really sure how to end the paper. After I compare all the positives and negatives, do I make a guess on whether or not we would survive economically? Am I supposed to say my personal opinion?... because there really is no way of knowing a true answer because it's all just a theoretical "if" question...
I feel like maybe I'm on the wrong track. Would there be a better way to put my information together or a better way to end it? I'm opened to any perspectives or suggestions because I'm stuck :) thanks
This is a very good topic , I happen to understand where you are coming from when you say you feel stuck like there is something you feel like you need to add. And honestly finding sources and able to share both sides of the argument is great , so I would explain your personal opinion but in a way that it isn't coming from you if that makes sense. So basically explain your "What ifs".
ReplyDelete